1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 495 million per annum from November 27, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

On September 10, 2009, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff a promissory note with a face value of KRW 545 million on or before the due date, and as of September 10, 201, with a payment proposal made by the Plaintiff on September 10, 201. The Plaintiff did not pay the above face value. The Plaintiff received KRW 100 million from the auction procedure against a third party and agreed with the Defendant to appropriate the payment of the above promissorysory note amount to pay the above amount, and it can be recognized as either there is no dispute between the parties, or in full view of the purport of the argument in subparagraph 1, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the balance of KRW 495 million ( KRW 500 million-50 million) and damages for delay from November 27, 2014, which is the day following the above payment date.

The defendant asserts that the person who actually used the funds raised from the above promissory note is the defendant's external village and the plaintiff's partner C, so it cannot respond to the plaintiff's request. However, the above circumstance alone cannot oppose the plaintiff's request.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.