logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.04.24 2013노458
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant does not cover the victim's left shoulder or get off from the taxi.

However, while the victim gets off the taxi, he was faced with her chests several times in the dispute.

The statements made by the victim are inconsistent and inconsistent with the statements made by the witness F.

In addition, the victim not only received medical treatment three days after the date of the occurrence of the instant case, but also cannot be ruled out the possibility that the victim suffered bodily injury due to other reasons because no particular credit is found at the time.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① The victim was driving a taxi from the police to the court of the court below to the court below, and sent a signal at the two-lanes front of the crosswalk, but the defendant, who followed the vehicle from the vehicle, was able to run the taxi on the front side of the crosswalk, and the defendant, who got from the vehicle, opened the window of the driver's seat, and the defendant was able to run the taxi on the left side of his own.

n. The defendant stated that he had been on several occasions his own ship, side gate, etc. that he had taken off from the taxi, and that the defendant had been on several occasions. The contents of the statement are generally consistent (it is somewhat inconsistent with the defendant's face, several confrontations, etc. are not consistent). ② At the time, F, who had taken on the spot, after cutting the crosswalk at the police, stated that he was at the police that the defendant was at the time f was at the time when her head was flick and flicked (Evidence Record 21 pages), in the court of the court below, the defendant and the victim were flick with each other, and that the victim was extremely unilaterally faced (No 54-55 pages of the trial record), and F made a false statement against the defendant (No 54-55 pages).

arrow