The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable to order the defendant to complete the six months of imprisonment with prison labor and the 80 hours of sexual assault treatment program, which the court below sentenced.

2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant, while making a confession of the crime, has repented, and that the photographed video is not deemed to have leaked to the outside.

On the other hand, the defendant has been punished four times for more than 60 months due to the poor quality of the crimes such as taking off the body of many unspecified victims over 60 times, and the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts in Public Crows).

Examining the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of probation due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts in Public Crow Places), and other conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is appropriate and the amount of the sentence is not unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.