The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of No. 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the judgment of the court for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 15, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a term of six-month suspension for fraud in the pure Support of the Gwangju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 23, 2013.

"2016 Highest 2468"

1. On August 16, 2012, the Defendant against the victim C is the owner of a building equivalent to KRW 800 million at the market price by displaying the register of the building of leisure water to the victim who requires 100 million won of the deposit money for lease on a deposit basis in the party room in E-gu operated by the victim C of the 2nd floor at the net city D Do-si around 2012.

It is thought that the principal would dispose of the building before the drilling, and at that time, he would receive the shares of the wife.

The money will be lent 100 million won on the deposit basis of the Gu party hall.

The money needs to be paid at the expense of the medical operation of A.I.D. The term “to pay 190,000 won in cash” was issued 39 times from that time to February 10, 2013, including the receipt of 190,000 won in cash, and 1,530,000 won in total, from that time.

However, the defendant would pay money to the defendant by disposing of the building above the delivery to the defendant as a person with bad credit standing who has only a debt up to the number of million won and has no certain income or property at the time.

In the end, there was no intention or ability to lend 100 million won or borrow money to the victim, such as there was no promise.

Accordingly, the defendant was given a total of 15.5 billion won by deceiving the victim.

"2016 Highest 2608"

2. On August 2, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim B calls the victim B to the victim B at an unsound place and requires the amount to be provided to the upper side.

A loan of 300,000 won shall be repaid within the next week.

“...”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a certain amount of income due to the closure of a mobile phone agency in operation, and there was no special property, and rather, he did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to the debt amounting to KRW 90 million.

The defendant is the victim as above.