The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The judgment below

2. The "G" of the 10th 2nd 10th am in the form of "V" and the 7th am in the form of "7th am in the form of "V".

1. The abstract of grounds for appeal (the defendant: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and ten months, and additional collection of 850,000 won);

2. The lower court determined that: (a) the social harm and severe punishment of a narcotics crime; (b) the necessity of severe punishment; (c) the Defendant has the same criminal history; and (d) each of the instant crimes is a crime committed during the repeated crime period; and (c) driving under the administration of

The above sentence was sentenced in consideration of the fact that a traffic accident was committed and escaped, the defendant showed the attitude of recognizing and opposing the error, active cooperation in the investigation of a narcotics case, and other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.

The sentencing of the lower court appears to be reasonable, and the circumstances alleged by the Defendant in this court are sufficiently considered in the lower court’s determination of the punishment, and there are no other special circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court. Therefore, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Since there is a clear clerical error as stated in the judgment below, it is decided to correct it ex officio pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure. It is so decided as per Disposition.