Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are not authorized to handle narcotics.

1. On June 17, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of Defendant A around 17:00, at a mutual singing shop located in the Chinese short-term Chinese city, the Defendant administered opphones by inserting approximately 0.2g of psychotropic drugs-related Mesofts (one penphone; hereinafter “Handphone”) at a gambling place, making the psychotropic drug 0.2g of psychotropic drugs pass through the water box containing water, leaving them pass through the water box containing the smoke.

2. Defendants’ co-principal conduct

A. On May 17, 2014, at around 17:00, the Defendants administered D hotel 407 in detail in the Philippines, and 0.5g philophones, respectively, in the manner as set out in the above paragraph 1, with each other’s cloppphones.

B. On May 21, 2014, at around 17:00, the Defendants administered the instant D Hotel 407, and 0.5g philophones in the same manner as the above 1, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A investigation report (Attachment to the current status of entry or departure), investigation report (Attachment to the current status of entry or departure);

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the detection photographs of administered narcotics, and reply requests for appraisal;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 60(1)2, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(b) (the point of the scopon medication in the lower patrol force on June 2013) of the Narcotics Control Act, Articles 60(1)2, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of the scopon medication around May 17, 2014, and around May 21, 2014), and each choice of imprisonment, respectively;

(b) Defendant B: Articles 60(1)2, 4(1)1, 2 subparag. 3(b), and 30 of the Criminal Act;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

3. Article 62(1) of each Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (The following circumstances considered favorable to the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing)

4. Defendant A: Narcotics.