logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.06.28 2018고단506
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a modern village bus B.

On November 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the above village bus around 10:40 on November 8, 2017, and led to a right-hand passage along the intersection of the Sinpo-si in Sinpo-si.

In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk (at the place where the stop line is installed, referring to the stop line) so as not to obstruct the passage of the pedestrian when the driver of the vehicle passes the crosswalk, or not to endanger the passage of the pedestrian.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk and did not temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk, and caused the victim C (the age of 57) who crossed the crosswalk from the right side to the left side of the crosswalk to go beyond the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the cutting of internal walls and internal walls, to the victim for about eight weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Efluoring a black stuffe image images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da

arrow