All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against the Defendants is too unreasonable in the lower court’s respective sentences (two years of suspended sentence in the month of imprisonment with prison labor, five million won of fine, five million won of probation and community service order, 80 hours of probation and community service order, Defendant B: the suspended sentence in the April of imprisonment with prison labor, two years of suspended sentence, four million won of fine, and 80 hours of probation and community service order).

2. The defendants' confessions made the confession and reflects the mistake, and in the case of the defendant A, there are no criminal records for the same kind of crime.

However, Defendant A is a business owner. Defendant B, as an employee, engaged in the brokerage of commercial sex acts using an Internet medium with high radio wave. The act of arranging commercial sex acts is highly harmful to society by commercializing women’s sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, and Defendant A’s resumption of business on October 16, 2014 after the first crackdown on October 26, 2014 and re-control on October 17, 2014; Defendant B was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million on October 28, 2013; and all circumstances revealed in the records, such as the motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records, etc., the punishment against each of the Defendants is unreasonable.

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.