1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the corresponding parts as follows. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The addition;

A. Subsequent to the first instance judgment’s 4th page 21, “The Plaintiff received inheritance” (the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer based on inheritance with respect to the real estate No. 2 on February 12, 1992, and Defendant B and C thereafter completed the registration of ownership transfer based on inheritance).

B. On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the following is added.

"Third, the plaintiff's father used the name "I" and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of "I," with respect to the real estate "I," on August 26, 1964, after the death of the head of G on August 20, 1973, "after the late 1960s, the plaintiff started to use the name "H" from around August 20, 1973, where "the death report was filed against the head of G," and "the plaintiff argued that the plaintiff's father started to use the name "H" from around August 20, 1973, where the plaintiff's father reported the death to the head of G (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 6 pages, Nov. 9, 2015; 2015; 4,5, 5, 2016, 207, 205, 25, 2016, 207, 2016).

However, from 1964 up to 38 years of age to 1926, or from 1973 up to 47 years of age, the plaintiff's reference is used for another name.