beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The criminal facts were modified ex officio on the basis of evidence.
Defendant
A On February 2, 2016, the same year is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 2 years of suspended execution for fraud in the Gwangju District Court's wooden branch.
9. The above judgment was finalized on 19.
Defendant
A is a person who engages in ship trade in the name of G and H in the name of the former, South, South, and North, the Republic of Korea is between the defendant B and the husband.
1. On June 25, 2015, the Defendants’ joint crimes [2016 senior group 1443] Defendant B filed an application for payment order demanding payment of KRW 50 million against Defendant B with the competent court of the Gwangju District Court of the Macheon-gun District Court of Gwangju District on June 25, 2015 (after Defendant B filed an objection, and the lawsuit was proceeded with by Gwangju District Court of the 2015 senior group 12608).
Accordingly, the Defendants were able to avoid the payment of the above debt when submitting the receipt certificate that is irrelevant to the above KRW 50 million, which they had kept in their custody, to the lawsuit for the above payment order.
A. On July 6, 2015, Defendant A entered “201-7-6,” and “B” in a copy of the receipt certificate that he previously possessed in the above G, which he had obtained from Defendant B.
As a result, the Defendants forged a receipt certificate in the name of the victim, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering in collusion.
B. On September 1, 2015, Defendant B submitted a forged receipt under Article 1-A of the above Act, along with the written reply that Defendant B repaid KRW 39 million out of the obligations arising from the above payment order through the head of the attorney-at-law office delegated by the Defendants through the head of the office of the attorney-at-law office.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to use the forged private document.
(c)
In order to exempt the Defendants from the obligation to pay KRW 31 million to the victims to the victims in the court of the Haak-gun District Court of Gwangju High Court of Daejeon District on September 1, 2015.