1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Defendant D and E shall be jointly and severally 86,437,255 won, Defendant A and Defendant A.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered into a medical contract and the process of medical treatment (1) operates the Plaintiff’s University Sym Hospital in the medical school of the annual household (hereinafter “Plaintiff hospital”).

Defendant A, B, C, and D are the F’s children who died while receiving treatment at the Plaintiff hospital, and Defendant E is the husband of Defendant B and the F’s husband.

(2) On February 16, 2008, F was diagnosed to be suspected of the fear of pharmony at a nearby hospital, and entered into a medical contract with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant medical contract”) with the Plaintiff at the Plaintiff hospital, and hospitalized in the respiratory department of the Plaintiff hospital.

At this time, Defendant D as a guardian of F, and Defendant E as a joint and several surety, agreed with F to pay the Plaintiff medical expenses under the instant medical contract jointly and severally with the Plaintiff.

(3) In order to confirm the occurrence of waste cancer on February 18, 2008, F had a serious stop due to an excessive surgery while undergoing a pulmonary tissue test using an engine diameter at the Plaintiff hospital.

Therefore, the medical personnel of the Plaintiff hospital has implemented the heart and has restored the heart function and attached an artificial absorption device. However, F has been placed in the continuous plant life condition due to low oxygen brain damage.

(4) As seen above, F was given conservation treatment, such as anti-biological medication, artificial nutrition supply, and water supply, with attaching an artificial absorption device at the Plaintiff hospital’s middle-patient room.

B. On June 2, 2008, the Defendant A, B, C, and D filed a lawsuit seeking removal of life-sustaining treatment device against the Plaintiff (Seoul Western District Court 2008Gahap6977, hereinafter “the lawsuit seeking discontinuance of life-sustaining treatment”) (hereinafter “the lawsuit seeking discontinuance of life-sustaining treatment”), and on June 11, 2008, the above complaint was served on the Plaintiff.

(2) On November 28, 2008, the above court dismissed Defendant A, B, C, and D’s claims, and accepted only F’s claims. The Defendant (the Plaintiff of this case) is an artificial smoking machine against F.