The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is the owner of CA car.

No one shall cover a registration number plate or make it illegible, and shall operate such a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, around 16:43 on May 26, 2016, the Defendant operated a vehicle number plate by attaching a back number plate of the CA car owned by the Defendant at the front of the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area D.

2. In this Court, the witness E: “The Defendant’s vehicle parked in front of the space where the Defendant visited his marina shop to be a customer, was placed on the Defendant’s vehicle number plate, attached a newspaper on the Defendant’s vehicle number plate, and was removed from the vehicle before the Defendant left his shop, and did not notify the Defendant of this fact.

“Inasmuch as testimony was made to the effect that “,” the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant made a registration number plate by attaching a newspaper on the vehicle, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, this part of the facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the defendant does not consent to a public notice of the judgment of innocence, and thus, the public notice of the judgment of innocence is not ordered pursuant to the proviso of Article