Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relationship between the parties led to the network F, G, H, and network I between the network E.
Defendant B is the wife of the network F, and Defendant C and D are children between Defendant B and the network F.
The networkF died on April 20, 2002.
B. As to the ownership of the real estate listed in the separate sheet on the register 1), the Plaintiff, the network F, G, H, and network I are each land listed in the separate sheet 1, 3, and 5 (hereinafter referred to as “each real estate of this case”).
On May 9, 1975, the Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer of 1/5 shares on the ground of gift. Of the real estate of this case 1, 3, and 5 on April 20, 2002, the Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer on the real estate of 3/35 shares in Defendant B and 3/35 shares in Defendant C, and 2/35 shares in separate sheet 2.2) on July 8, 2002, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on July 8, 200, on the real estate of 3/7 shares in Defendant B, Defendant C, and D, respectively.
3) As to the real estate listed in the separate sheet 4, the deceased F completed the registration of ownership transfer by inheritance of property due to a consultation division. On April 20, 2002, Defendant B succeeded the deceased F and completed the registration of ownership transfer by inheritance of the Defendants, Defendant C, and D, respectively, on April 20, 200, each of the shares of the Defendants as to each of the instant real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant shares”).
(C) On December 10, 2015, the Defendants sold each of the instant shares to J and K. On February 1, 2016, the Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the instant shares 3.5 shares among the instant real estate 1, 3, and 5, and 3.5 shares among the instant real estate 1, 3, and 5, and 3.5 shares among the instant real estate 2, and 4, respectively. [Grounds for recognition] The Defendants did not dispute, i.e., Gap’s evidence 1 through 4, 8, and Eul’s evidence 1 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).
- The purport of the whole pleadings
2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff, the husband of the Plaintiff’s primary and conjunctive claim, is the Plaintiff, who is the Plaintiff’s husband.