logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.09.01 2015고정895
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as the representative of the council of occupants' representatives, is an employer who conducts apartment management business by using one regular worker, at the time of promotion of the facts charged.

From June 1, 1998 to October 31, 2014, the Defendant did not pay the total of KRW 20,164,800 to E’s wages of workers who provided labor in the above apartment house within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment date.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act;

B. On September 1, 2015, after the institution of the instant indictment, workers E appeared in the court and expressed his/her intent not to punish the Defendant.

Judgment dismissing public prosecution: It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow