(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.01.09 2017가단62849

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.01.09 2017가단62849

손해배상(산)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from September 2, 2014 to January 9, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

1. On September 2, 2014, the Plaintiff is an employee of the Defendant Company, and around 13:50 on September 2, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the middle floor of the Defendant Company’s Industrial Complex and removed brooms attached to a mixture with a gra and broom brooms on the first floor, where C, which was being cleaned on the first floor, performs the supply of electricity, and stop by blocking the supply of electricity on the gurgs. The Plaintiff was faced with an accident that cut off from both sides by operating two-storys on the wind.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 3 through 7, 12, and 13 (including paper numbers), Gap evidence Nos. 2, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 8 and 9 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances, which can be seen by witness D, C, E, and F testimony of each of the above evidence, Gap evidence No. 4, Eul evidence No. 8, Eul evidence No. 10, and Eul evidence No. 10, i.e., mixed materials containing sensitive red dusts and liquids with the above mixed material, which seems not to have been easy to clean up easily, and in some of the employees, it seems to have been easy to clean the mixed material. In the case of cleaning the mixed material, the employees of the defendant company did not block all of the mixed material in order to easily see the mixed material, and it seems that the defendant company was able to clean up the mixed material by using the source location in the control tower or location of the unit without blocking it, and it was suggested that the plaintiff company installed the above mixed material at the location of the plaintiff company, but it was suggested that the plaintiff company was not able to install the mixing (the plaintiff company's proposal that it was not able to do so).

In addition, the plaintiff is in the location of the mixing machine of this case and its side among the multiple mixing machines.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2018.05.16 2018고단49

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.18 2019가합526328

-부산지방법원동부지원 2014.12.24 2011가단26706

-광주지방법원 2019.02.13 2017가단506962

-서울동부지방법원 2017.05.12 2016가단124222