The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The Defendant, while running the Defendant Company C, contracted the construction of the construction of the treatment-based sewage culvert of the Cheongbuk-do and the treatment-based division of the Cheongwon-gun D and Ewon (hereinafter “instant construction”) that was ordered by the police officer of the Seocho-do on October 2006, and had the victim F perform the construction work by subcontracting to the victim F around October 2007, the Defendant suspended the construction work due to the Defendant’s failure to receive the construction cost from the Defendant on August 2008 and completed the construction site.

In order to continue the above construction work on November 2008, the Defendant got G to take over the above construction work, and then, in order to cover the construction cost, the Defendant stolen the construction work cost by having G, which is equivalent to the total market price of KRW 50,000,000,000,000 in the market price of the victim's possession, which was kept by the victim, covered the luminous gate in front of the Nonghyup located in the Doggg, the victim's Dog in front of the victim's Dog, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, including h beam 9.

Judgment

1. The following facts can be acknowledged according to the witness F’s partial statement, the witness G’s legal statement, part of the material submitted by the complainant, such as the statement or statement, the name box, etc. among the material submitted by the complainant, the police interrogation protocol of the complainant against G, some of the copy of the investigation report (information on telephone conversations of the witness), the takeover agreement of the defendant, the police interrogation protocol of the defendant against F, some of the prosecutor’s protocol of interrogation of the prosecution against A (including the G statement) among the prosecutor’s protocol of interrogation of the prosecutor’s office against B (including the part of the prosecutor’s protocol)

Around October 2006, the Defendant, the representative of C, was awarded a contract for the instant construction with H, and the instant construction was suspended on or around March 2007 due to H’s default.

Around October 2007, the Defendant agreed to independently carry out the instant construction work between Cheongdo-gun and Cheongdo-gun. F is the instant construction work from the Defendant.