The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendant, as a witness, made a false statement contrary to memory, the lower court convicted him of this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the trial court on the assertion of facts, i.e., (i) purchase of KRW 1/2 equity shares out of KRW 1,322 square meters of forest 1,322 square meters (hereinafter “the instant forest equity”) through D through D, and D made a contract by deceiving E, such as showing land other than the said forest land at the time, and had L enter into a contract with “E purchase of KRW 35 million” with L, thereby completing the registration of transfer of ownership of the said equity interest by forging a sales contract with the purport that “the said equity interest was purchased at KRW 35 million.” The above content of the above crime of fraud, fabrication of private documents, and fraud of the said documents and the crime of gambling in the said documents, which was sentenced to a suspension of one-year imprisonment with prison labor for not more than KRW 600,000,000,0000,000 for the instant forest and forest loan of KRW 200,000.

As a matter of course, the witness G of the relevant case has consistently made a statement. (4) The witness G sells the shares in the instant forest.