logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2015.06.24 2013가단6209
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiffs' primary claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The defendants are individually 1/3.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the following facts: (a) evidence No. 1-1 to 3; (b) evidence No. 3; (c) evidence No. 4; and (d) the purport of the entire pleadings, the fact that L was assessed against K forest land No. 21231 square meters (hereinafter “K forest”); (c) L died on or around February 5, 1961; (d) registration of preservation of ownership of L’s heir’s M on February 20, 1989 in relation to K forest land was made on or around February 20, 1989; (e) registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Defendants, a heir of M on November 20, 2006, who is the heir of M on November 20, 2006 in relation to each of the 1/3 shares of K forest land.

2. Judgment on the primary cause of the claim

A. The plaintiffs purchased the land of this case from L on March 10, 1954 by the plaintiff's husband and the other plaintiff's husband and the plaintiff's wife. The plaintiffs purchased from L on March 10, 1954 the land of this case from L to 15,000, and the plaintiffs are N' inheritors, because they sought the registration of transfer of ownership based on the above sales contract against the defendants who are K forest owners. Thus, according to the following facts: N died on June 22, 2012; the plaintiff Eul, Eul, D, E, F, and G; the plaintiff's spouse's husband and children; the plaintiffs were managing N's graves, etc. on the land of this case; the plaintiffs were able to recognize the fact that they cultivated N's graves, trees, nights, etc. on the land of this case; however, there is no sufficient evidence to acknowledge the existence of the above part of the plaintiffs' testimony.

B. In full view of the reasoning of the judgment as to the plaintiffs' conjunctive cause, Gap evidence 8-1 through 22, Gap evidence 9-1 through 4, Eul evidence 9-1 to 4, Eul's testimony, appraiser's testimony, appraiser P's survey and appraisal results, N planting of night trees, tweet trees, etc. on the land of this case from 1960 to 1960.

arrow