logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.11.14 2013고합21
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged [basic facts] The defendant was the representative director of E from 2003 to 2007, and F is the de facto representative director of the victim G corporation established for the purpose of real estate development, sale, lease, management business, etc. from 2004 to 2004, and the victim H was the actual representative director of G from 2004 to 2009. The victim H was the actual manager of F and was the representative director in the name of G from 2004 to 2009.

Around August 2007, the Defendant: (a) at the G office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul; and (b) even if the Defendant did not lend KRW 1 billion to F, the Defendant was given consent from F on the ground that “I lend money to F, as it is very low between the J of the Busan Savings Bank and the J of the Busan Savings Bank and it is necessary to repay the money; and (c) if there is a request for the loan, it would be reasonable to grant a loan from H to lend KRW 1 billion with the loan in its name.”

The Defendant and F: “F and H borrowed a total of KRW 1 billion from the Defendant on September 16, 2005; KRW 150 million on February 23, 2006; KRW 300 million on July 11, 2006; KRW 350 million on August 16, 2006; KRW 150 million on February 23, 2006; KRW 4,000,000 on the loan written in F and H’s joint name; and KRW 50 billion on the loan written in Busan Savings Bank Co.,, Ltd. (hereinafter “UB Savings Bank”) and applied for a loan of KRW 1 billion on July 23, 2006.”

Accordingly, the Busan Savings Bank extended a loan of KRW 1 billion in the name of H on condition that F and G guarantee, but the purpose of the loan was to pay KRW 1 billion to the defendant.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, as seen above, was detained in embezzlement, etc. on October 15, 2008 when the F was kept in custody of the loan without returning the loan certificate even after having obtained the loan by using a false loan certificate, and the F deducteds the G and F’s property.

arrow