beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00 and by a fine of KRW 15,00,000, respectively.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 22, 2011, Defendant B: (a) at the G market near the G market located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) purchased at the G market near the G market; and (c) at the G market near the G market, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily withdrawn a request for auction on the condition that he/she will repay part of the collateral security obligation by negotiating with the mortgagee who applied for auction; and (b) may receive the ownership transfer on the condition that he/she would be relieved of the collateral security obligation; and (c) then, (d) the owner shall enter into a repayment agreement with the mortgagee for the obligation negotiated with the mortgagee and have the application for auction withdrawn; and (d) the down payment for the implementation of the agreement is necessary. If the down payment is leased, the obligation repayment agreement is entered into with the money; (e) the remainder is paid with the loan from the head of the agricultural branch; and (e) there is no problem in obtaining the loan, and (e) the money necessary for the repayment agreement, down payment, expenses, etc., from the victim and made the Defendant A to lend money.
However, the Defendant was not the head of the agricultural branch and was not the Defendant, but was not the Defendant’s plan to obtain a new loan on the said real estate as collateral without a separate financing plan for the balance of the obligation to be repaid to the mortgagee, but the plan was not clear as to whether to obtain a loan. Therefore, the said real estate did not have the ability to obtain a loan without a framework for security, and there was no ability to obtain a loan on the said real estate more than the amount of the repayment agreement with the mortgagee, and there was no ability to obtain a loan on the real estate in excess of the amount of the repayment agreement, and there was no ability to obtain a loan on the real
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim through A and belongs to it.