logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.04.20 2016고단2553
강제추행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and a fine of 2,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 20, 2016, the Defendant’s forced indecent act: (a) received a request from the Defendant’s residence located in D 202 located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 12:30 on August 20, 2016 from the Victim E (V, 25 years old); (b) on the part of the victim E (V), for a long time to request the operation of a franchis surgery to be carried out on the part of the franchis chest; and (c) “I need to leave the franchis. When doing the operation

“In the end, the victim was forced to be off from panty, and was off, and was covered by the victim’s panty panty panty shield.

Then, the Defendant, after completing a literacy procedure, has “n't operate in a state of domination.”

“Along with the victim’s conspiracy, the part of the victim’s negative was knife by taking the pleass in the victim’s conspiracy with fingers.”

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. A person who is not a doctor in violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes shall be prohibited from engaging in medical practice for profit-making purposes;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining a doctor’s license, posted an advertisement in the same place as that of paragraph (1) around February 1, 2016 to around March, 2016, to the effect that it is equipped with equipment, such as literature credit IMs, beauty ber, etc., and that it is “in the course of administering other drugs” on the Internet page around May 2, 2016, and received KRW 100,000 in return for providing services using the aforementioned equipment, medicine, etc. from around 12:00 to around 30 August 2016, the Defendant received KRW 50,000 in return for providing services to the above E in the same manner and received KRW 80,000 in return for providing services from February 20, 2016 to August 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in medical practice for profit-making purposes even though he was not a doctor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the prosecution and the police interrogation of the accused;

1. E.

arrow