Since a lawsuit on a tort can be brought to the court in the place of the act, even if the address of the re-appellant is in Jeju-do, the place of the tort is Seoul, and there is jurisdiction over the Seoul Civil & Security District Court.

[Judgment of the court below]

Kim Dok Kim

Seoul High Court Order 73Ra46 dated 26, 1973

The reappeal is dismissed.

The Re-Appellant's re-appellant's ground of appeal is determined.

According to Article 16 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act, a lawsuit concerning a tort may be brought to the court located in the place of the act (special trial). According to the records, the opposing Kim Ba-dong, Kim Jong-dong, by deceiving the other party that the re-appellant would engage in a consignment sale business such as the office and office in the Seoul East-dong market, and the other party who is deceiving the other party that the other party would buy money KRW 2,00,000,000, was brought to the Seoul Private District Court. However, since the other party's illegal act is Seoul, the judgment of the court below that has jurisdiction over the Seoul Private District Court is just, and since the other party's domicile is Jeju-do, there is no argument that the Seoul Private District Court does not have jurisdiction.

Therefore, the reappeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Byung-ho (Presiding Justice)