Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-Scar.
On August 28, 2017, the defendant operated the above car around 02:05, and proceeded with the main road that is the exclusive road for motor vehicles in front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City along the first two-lanes in the direction of the military in the direction of the military.
In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall comply with the restricted speed so that it can take appropriate measures when a sudden situation occurs, and even if it is a motor vehicle-only road, he/she has the duty of care to reduce the speed immediately when a person crossing the road is discovered, and to safely drive the motor vehicle to prevent the accident in advance by avoiding the situation and driving the motor vehicle safely.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the victim E (37 years old) who enters the third lane from the kick on the front side to the first lane due to the negligence that the speed of the restriction exceeds 70 km a speed of 150 km a hour, and did not properly operate the operation of the operation and steering gear, and the victim was shocked with the front part of the vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim at the emergency room of a university hospital in a dry country on the same day on the same day by occupational negligence as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;
1. Investigation report (additional confirmation report as a result of traffic accident analysis);
1. Protocol of inspection;
1. Submissions of traffic accident analysis reports;
1. Blue images of black stuffs;
1. A death certificate;
1. Bluk video CD (the Defendant and his defense counsel, as the Defendant and his defense counsel changed the kickboard to cross the road at the site of the accident of this case, which is an exclusive road for motor vehicles, so even if the Defendant got driving at the speed of 80 km per hour, which is limited by the Defendant, the speed of 80 km, could not avoid collision, and therefore there was no causal relation between the Defendant’s negligence and the accident of this case.