1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Attached Form

With respect to the stated accident, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. G Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is an insurer that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D ready-light cars (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

B. On April 13, 2007, C: (a) around 17:30 on April 13, 2007, while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle and driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle on a road for the national repair of both documents in Gyeonggi-gun, it did not properly look at the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle; and (b) caused the rear part of the E driver’s F vehicle in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was signaled in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, without properly operating the brake.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The defendant was diagnosed on May 14, 2007, while receiving treatment due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2 (including additional number), Eul evidence 18, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant suffered only injuries to the cryp, the cryp, and the crypoid, due to the accident of this case, and the treatment of the above injury was completed. Thus, the plaintiff's claim that the defendant does not have any further obligation to pay damages to the defendant due to the accident of

B. The defendant's assertion that the defendant suffered injury from the injury caused by the relevant accident, and caused a brush, and some symptoms have been mitigated, but there exist mergers, such as neutronism, light, respiratory function degradation, neutronism, neutronism, neutronism, autonomous neutronism, and effacy control disorder. Therefore, the plaintiff, the insurer of the plaintiff vehicle, is liable to compensate the defendant for the damage caused by the instant accident.

3. Determination

A. First of all, we examine whether the Defendant suffered injuries from the instant accident and symptoms, such as gymnasium and gymnasium, and gymnasium Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul, which seem to correspond thereto.