logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2020.01.08 2019가단1480
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Appointed Party) to the Plaintiff is KRW 8,800,000, KRW 7,480,000, KRW 7,800, and KRW 7,480,00, and Defendant E.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence 2-1 through 5, evidence 3-1 through evidence 3-7 as to the cause of the claim, J, the agent of the plaintiff (which was changed to the current trade name as of August 20, 2019) for the processing, manufacturing, wholesale and retail business, etc. of functional agricultural, livestock and fishery products, and for the plaintiff (which was changed to the current trade name as of August 20, 2019), as the agent of the defendant (appointed party) and the designated parties (hereinafter "the defendant") on January 16, 2019, and the "Sek ginseng Green (1:70 x 30 x 30 x 30 x 400 x 700 x 30 x 50 x 1500 x 205 x 205 x 170 x 208 x 50 x 170 x 25 x 10

According to this, the defendants are obliged to pay the price of each of the above goods and damages for delay.

2. Determination on the defense, etc.

A. At the time of the conclusion of the aforementioned contract, C and J agreed not to reduce the price of the said product sold in the Internet shopping mall between the parties (the price of the first set confirmed by C at that time was 59,900 won) since the Defendants would be expected to deliver the said product to the customer as the goods of the snow saving.

Afterwards, the Defendants sold the goods in the Internet shopping mall in KRW 26,900.

The plaintiff is the same as supplying the above product to the defendants at a price lower than the actual price, and the above contract was concluded, and thus the above contract is revoked.

In addition, since the plaintiff (or J) is willing to mislead and not receive the price, the defendants are not obligated to pay the price.

B. Each of the above evidences and evidence set forth in Nos. 1 to 3 as a whole.

arrow