(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.04 2016노2507 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.04 2016노2507

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

transparent vinyl that has been seized.

Reasons

1. In full view of the evidence presented by the prosecutor in the grounds of appeal, although it is sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the defendant sold philophones in collusion with E and B, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. On August 29, 2014, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case against the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence), and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 9, 2015.

The Defendant, along with E and B, purchased philophones from F to sell philophones and conspired to divide profits from selling them to the general public. The Defendant conspired to serve as the role of purchasing or withdrawing philophones from F, the role of posting an advertisement on philophones on Internet portal sites, in the case of B, in the case of Golophones, following the Internet portal sites, and in the case of negotiating or withdrawing the philophones price, delivery method, and in the case of E, the role of negotiating the philophones price and delivery method with the purchase applicants, and in the case of E, storing or packing the philo

1) On March 7, 2014, the Defendant, in collusion with E, B, sold an influoral phone in collusion with E, B, by receiving KRW 100,000,000 from the Defendant, E, or B to an account of personal compromise (J) in the name of the Defendant, E, or B used, and sending a non-fluoral phone to C, which was in custody in the paper bank, by sending the non-fluoral phone to E, in large number of express bus freight. 2) The Defendant sold the non-fluoral phone in collusion with E, and around March 10, 2014, the Defendant sold the fluoral phone in a way of sending the fluoral phone to the above personal compromise (J) from the non-fluorial person and sending the fluoral phone to the above non-fluoral person under a high-speed bus freight.

B. The lower court determined that the Defendant purchased phiphones with E and sold the said phiphones in collusion with E and with E.

참조조문

-마약류 관리에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 의성지원 2016.06.09 2016고단5

-청주지방법원 2015.10.29 2015고단1451

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.08.30 2018고단1553

-전주지방법원 2016.11.03 2016고단1306

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고정2112