logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.05.19 2016노637
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(주거침입강제추행)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, even though he did not have the breath of the victim by taking the breath of the victim's breath in front of the victim's house, and did not have the fact that she either entered the victim's residence or she sparddddly her the victim's chest, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of fact: ① The victim, in the police and court of the court of the court below, "I see the victim's chests in the process by drawing the victim's house gate from the Gap's own gate, so I see the defendant's chests in the process, so I see the victim's gate, and I see the victim's gate without the defendant, and I am "I am am". The father of the victim in the house, in the house, listens to the sound of the gate, was sent to the victim, or the defendant was sealed out of the house, and made a relatively detailed and detailed statement about the circumstances of the damage and circumstances; ② The father of the victim, "I am am in the police station", "I am am out of the victim's house," so I see that I am "I am am out of the victim's house and am out of the bar," and let the victim's door.

The defendant is the victim of the first witness when out of the room.

arrow