The successor number is as shown in paragraph (1) of the "Indication of Real Estate" attached from the plaintiff A, and as shown in paragraph (2).

1. Comprehensively taking into account the purport of evidence No. 1 to No. 10 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Plaintiff A entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants on a five-year period from March 6, 2015 to March 5, 202 with respect to the apartment as stated in paragraph (1) of the “Real Estate Indication” (hereinafter “instant first apartment”) around December 27, 2013; ② Plaintiff B entered into the lease agreement with the Defendants on a five-year period from March 6, 2015 to March 1, 202; ② Plaintiff B entered into the lease agreement with the Defendants on an apartment as stated in paragraph (2) of the “Indication of Real Estate” (hereinafter “instant Second apartment”) as to the apartment as stated in the attached Form No. 2 of the instant lease agreement with the Defendants around December 29, 2013, and each of the instant parties’ succession to the lease agreement with the Defendants on March 25, 2015 to the expiration of the lease agreement.

According to the above facts of recognition, the successor transferee acquired the ownership of the first and second apartments of this case, and succeeded to the status of the defendants as lessors under each of the above lease agreements between the plaintiffs and the defendants.

Therefore, the successor is obliged to restore the first apartment to its original state following the termination of each of the above lease agreements, to receive the second apartment of this case from the plaintiff Eul, and to pay the plaintiffs the amount of KRW 98 million each of the lease deposit to the plaintiffs, and to the first and second of this case from the plaintiffs.