The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Each of the crimes in this case with mental disorder is committed in a state of mental disorder.

The sentence of the lower court on unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the circumstances before and after each of the instant crimes, the background leading up to each of the instant crimes, the means and methods of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant’s behavior at the time of the instant crime, etc., which could have been revealed by the records of the judgment on the assertion of mental disorder, it does not appear that the Defendant did not have or lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of preventing each

Therefore, the defendant's mental disorder is without merit.

In full view of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized each of the instant offenses, the fact that the Defendant’s economic situation is difficult, etc., and the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses even during the repeated offense period, etc., the Defendant’s unfavorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s character, character, environment, means and consequence of the instant offenses, and other various sentencing conditions, such as the circumstances after the commission of the offense, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.