logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.09.27 2019고단541
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B rocketing car.

At around 15:20 on September 1, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded at the speed of the 4-lane in front of the D, which is located in Asan-si Member C, Asan-si, at the parallel distance from the chill-gu, Chungcheongnam-do.

Since signal lights are installed at the front of that place, there is an intersection, the person engaged in the vehicle driving duty has a duty of care to safely drive and prevent accidents in advance by safely checking whether there are other vehicles waiting for signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to discover other vehicles in the traffic signal atmosphere due to the negligence of driving a stroke while driving the vehicle, and caused the part of the victim E (the 39-year-old driver), who was waiting to the right side of the F Kanp in the direction of the Defendant’s running, to the front part of the F Kanpon of the F 39-year-old driver’s vehicle, and caused the said vehicle to be pushed back by the shock or between the above 1st part of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim E, a driver of the said van, to inflict injury on brain-dead sugar, etc. with no head open within about 3 weeks of treatment, and caused the victim I (the age of 21) who was on board the said van to suffer injury, such as 11, 12, and 12, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment, such as chest pressure pressure so as to inflict approximately 2 weeks of treatment, and caused the victim J (3) of the said crime to inflict injury upon the victim G, who is the said rocketing driver, to suffer from the injury of brain-dead, etc. without a head open in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, such as dystroid and tension in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Relevant legal provisions concerning charges of applicable provisions of Acts: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act: Crimes of non-compliance with intent:

arrow