(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.16 2017재나112

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.16 2017재나112

소유권보존등기말소등

Text

1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

3...

Reasons

1. (1) AC (the “instant land, regardless of whether before or after the conversion registration was made,” is registered as its owner in the land investigation division prepared by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, which was executed by the Joseon-gun AB, the Joseon-gun, the Joseon-gun, the Joseon-gun, the Joseon-gun, and the Land Investigation Division, which was converted into a flat distance of 1,336 (the real estate stated in the purport of the claim was converted into a flat distance of February 10, 1978).

The plaintiff is a parent of AC.

(2) As to the land of this case, ① AD (Death on May 1, 1969) completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on October 5, 1973 under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Public Farmland (hereinafter “the registration of ownership transfer”), ② the registration of ownership transfer based on the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094, Nov. 30, 1992) on August 8, 1994; ③ the registration of ownership transfer based on the registration of ownership transfer based on the sale on August 1, 1982 under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992).

(3) On November 3, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants (However, in the event of filing a lawsuit, P, who is the inheritee of the said Defendants, not Defendant AS, AT, and AU, was the Defendant) to seek the cancellation of registration of ownership preservation as the court of competent jurisdiction (the first instance court) No. 2011Da14369.

In the above case, the Plaintiff asserted that “The instant land was inherited by the Plaintiff solely after being assessed by AC, the father of the Plaintiff, and the registration of each ownership transfer of this case was completed by a false letter of guarantee, and thus, the presumption that it conforms to the substantive legal relationship has been broken.”

(4) The court of first instance rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on July 27, 2012.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원여주지원 2012.07.27 2011가단14369

-수원지방법원 2013.10.18 2012나30028

-제주지방법원 2017.09.14 2016나2147

-수원지방법원 2011.11.03 2010가합19764