logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.12.19 2017고정296
위증교사
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and the Defendant appealed and appealed, but each of the appeals was dismissed, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 20, 2017.

On April 13, 2015, from around September 22, 2015 to around September 22, 2015, the Defendant employed “D adult gameland” from “D adult gameland” to “E” as an employee and operated a game room business, and an unspecified number of customers exchanged scores obtained using game water.

In order to obtain a judgment favorable to oneself as a result of the foregoing facts, the Defendant was prosecuted with E and was subject to a criminal trial. In order to obtain a judgment favorable to himself/herself, the Defendant is bound to reverse his/her statement to E in the influence game in the middle of January 2017.

검찰에서 한 진술을 번복해서 ‘ 환전을 해 주지 않았고, 그냥 내가 게임을 하려고 손님 돈을 바꿔줬다.

D. The remainder will be responsible by finding out whether the remainder is inside and outside.

The request for " shall be made, and the testimony shall be made at the last request of the police officer on February 2017 at the third time.

“At the request of “E to have E feel perjury.”

E In this regard, as of March 10, 2017, from the court of law No. 217 of the Chuncheon District Court 3288-18 (Seongdong-dong), E has been present as a witness after separation from the pleading in the case of violation of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry against Defendant A and two other than Defendant A in the above court at the court of law No. 2016 order 2016 order order, and has been sworn as a witness, and there is no question to the prosecutor’s question, “I have the fact that the witness has caused the exchange.”

“The testimony was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant instigated E to give perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. The protocol (F) and recording paper of the examination of witness;

1. A report on investigation, the filing of a record of examination of a witness and a record book;

1. An investigation report (Report on the binding of a statement in G) 1.

arrow