1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a party to the dispute. The Plaintiff is a company running an insurance business such as automobile insurance, etc., and the Plaintiff is a vehicle A SPC-owned A (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

2) As to the automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”)

(2) The Defendant is the building and manager of the national highway No. 31, including the 31st place where the death officer was killed at the port at the time of the occurrence of the instant traffic accident.

B. At around 22:30 on June 29, 2013, B: (a) driven the instant vehicle and opened the first line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line of the front line

(2) At the time, the steel diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary divershsives

) A concrete safety wall (CSB, Concrete Safet), which is a bridge protection fence installed in a bridge after shocking of the bamboo officer (hereinafter referred to as “ concrete safety wall”).

(2) The accident point of this case conflicts with the edge of the vehicle of this case at the top of the vehicle of this case. The accident point of this case is the road bended to the right side again at the entrance of the dead officer who was bound to the left side by viewing the progress direction of the vehicle of this case. There is a gap between 1.2m wide between steel drums and the concrete safety wall installed on the bridge of the dead officer who was installed at the right side of the opposite lane, and there was no protective fence in the gap. In addition, the shock absorption facility was not installed at the end of the concrete safety wall of concrete exposed to the outside.

On the other hand, the present vehicle.