The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of mistake of facts, the defendant had no intention to interfere with business.

B. The lower court’s sentence on the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The court below consistently stated the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below to the court below, namely, from the investigation agency to the court below, that "the victim was unable to lock the water pipe valves for about one hour in the beauty room of the victim without any prior notification from the defendant, and contact with the defendant was not made, and the defendant could not contact, and the defendant could not leave the first floor of the building from the victim, like the victim, operated the mobile phone store by leasing the first floor of the building from the defendant." At the time of the investigation agency, F stated that "the defendant used the second floor toilet if the water can cut down, if the water was cut down, it was cut down, and the victim stated that the water was not constructed at the time of the request by the investigation agency, and that it was consistent with the victim's above statement by the defendant and the victim had not been installed at the time of the request from the investigation agency for construction of the water pipe, and that the victim could not have been able to manage the building of this case on the day before the request was made by the victim's prior to the outer valve of this case.