The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In a case where there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s determination on the Defendant’s unfair assertion of sentencing, and where the lower court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). This court did not submit new data on sentencing, and there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the factors of sentencing indicated in the records and pleadings, such as the fact that the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak in light of the content of the crime committed by the defendant, and the injury of the victim has not yet been recovered, even if considering the factors of sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the crime by the defendant and the absence of criminal history, the sentence of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion by too

shall not be deemed to exist.

The defendant's assertion that the sentencing of the court below is unfair is not accepted.

2. Conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of grounds.