logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.06.14 2016고단610
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is an employer who runs the restaurant business of the trade name “C” with two full-time workers in the Full-time City, Busan-gu, Seoul-si.

When an employee retires, the employer shall pay the wages, etc. within 14 days after the cause for such payment occurred.

Even so, Defendant D’s retirement from June 29, 2015 to December 24, 2015, which was employed by the said workplace, did not pay KRW 700,000 from the date of retirement within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act;

B. On May 23, 2016, after the instant indictment, a written withdrawal of complaint containing an employee D’s intent not to have the Defendant punished.

Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow