logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.12.12 2014구단1364
요양일부불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 15, 2009, the Plaintiff was suffering from occupational accidents (traffic accidents) and obtained approval for medical care from the Defendant on June 29, 201 for the “satisfe-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de

B. On the other hand, on March 15, 2013, the Plaintiff received MRI inspection at Lan University Hospital on the right shoulder, and as a result, it was found that there was a complete opinion, the Plaintiff applied for additional medical care related to the above additional medical care on March 29, 2013, and received non-approval from the Defendant on April 30, 2013. However, on August 19, 2013, the Plaintiff received re-operation related to the above additional medical care at the above hospital on August 19, 2013. In the examination procedure on October 4, 2013, the foregoing additional medical care was observed, and even according to the record of re-operation, the above non-approval disposition was revoked on the ground that the treatment of the above additional medical care was less than the treatment of the parts of the surgery, and the Defendant approved the above additional medical care with respect to the Plaintiff on October 8, 2013.

C. On March 4, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the payment of temporary disability compensation benefits for a period from July 1, 2011 to March 4, 2014 on the premise that the symptoms were not fixed even after the date of the first medical care was terminated. However, on March 12, 2014, the Defendant approved the period of the additional medical care to the Plaintiff only from March 15, 2013 to July 30, 201, and the instant disposition that was not approved from July 1, 201 to March 14, 201, and thereafter, the entire period of the additional medical care for the Plaintiff was recognized from March 15, 2013 to March 31, 2014.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap’s 1 through 3 evidence, Eul’s 1, 2, 3, and 5(including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the above additional injury and disease rank after May 31, 201.

arrow