The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The decision of the court below is that the defendant made confession of all of the crimes of this case and is in violation of depth, that the crime of this case is limited to a single-time medication, that there is a family member to support the defendant including the victim and his children who are administered by the defendant, that the defendant cooperates with the investigation of the investigative agency as well as the defendant's intent to put a single-time medication. However, the defendant committed the crime of this case in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had been punished four times in the same kind of crime, the court below seems to have determined the punishment considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of the sentencing of the same similar case. Considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case,

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.