1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s deceased B (C life, hereinafter “the deceased”) worked in the Jindo Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Hindo”) from September 29, 1980 to November 30, 193.

On November 21, 1993, the Deceased was exposed to the Eulphane, which is a toxic substance, while working at the Eulphal temperature, and was approved by the Defendant on November 21, 1993 for medical care for the Eulphical poisoning and its merger mark.

Since then, the deceased has been receiving the pain treatment for the ulule carbon poisoning and its complicationation.

B. The Deceased returned home on October 1, 2013, after drinking around 22:00.

around 00:30 on October 2, 2013, family members of the deceased moved the deceased to the Incheon D Hospital located and hospitalized the deceased for the treatment of alcohol-related pain( alcohol addiction) of the deceased.

On October 2, 2013, the Deceased appeared to show blue luxa around 04:50 on October 2, 2013 while hospitalized in the D Hospital and continued to be luxa, and on October 2, 2013, the Deceased died around 05:21 on October 2, 2013.

C. On October 22, 2013, the Plaintiff claimed for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant. However, on December 18, 2013, the Defendant refused the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that the deceased’s death does not constitute an occupational accident because of the reason that it does not constitute a proximate causal relation with the Eululcarbon addiction.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was treated for a long time with respect to the Eulphane addiction and its complication, but the symptoms were not found, which led to the occurrence of depression, uneasiness, stress, etc., and the Plaintiff’s serious alcohol ozone to alleviate this.

Therefore, the deceased's death constitutes an occupational accident in proximate causal relation with the Eulphan poisoning.