A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On August 21, 2015, at around 01:23, the Defendant: (a) took two or more nearby fire scenes in front of the Mine Police Station D District, Young-gun, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu; (b) took a mobile phone-based dispute; and (c) took the victim E (math, South, and 37 years old), a slope belonging to the said district police station, who controlled neighboring traffic by the Defendant; (d) took the victim’s head; and (e) took the victim’s head, who tried to prevent him/her from doing so by getting approximately 10 days of treatment; and (e) in the process of continuously arresting the victim as a flagrant offender in obstruction of the performance of the performance of the performance of official duties, the Defendant shicked the victim’s franch with his/her part of the left-hand part, which requires treatment for about 10 days.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim who was a police officer in the course of performing legitimate duties concerning the maintenance of public order and criminal investigation, thereby obstructing the execution of public duties, and at the same time inflicting an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of the prosecutor's suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding E;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of photographs at the time of committing the crime);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and case-related photographs

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case, for reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Probation Criminal Act, is committed against a police officer who prevented a police officer from traffic control by probin, leading him to scambling, and continued to assault a police officer in light of the form and degree of the assault, which led to the obstruction of performance of official duties (special scambling person). In light of the above, the Defendant is subject to punishment corresponding thereto.