logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.21 2014고단5877
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on July 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 120,000 from a police officer who found the customer who pretended to engage in the act of sexual intercourse, and (b) directed him as a secret room; and (c) had, in order to engage in sexual intercourse, the Defendant entered the E, a female of the mother’s nationality.

In addition, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for business from June 2014 to July 15, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Each prosecutor and police investigation report (the No. 3, 11, 17 of the evidence list);

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of statutes on copies of books;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., collectively, through the relevant Articles of the Acts and the choice of punishment for the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;

1. Reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act / [Type ] Basic Field of Type 2, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic subject to the age of 19 years or older of the sexual traffic crime group / [territory and scope of recommendations] - From six months to one year and four months [decision of a sentence] imprisonment - 40 hours to put in probation for 10 months a stay of ten months or more - Defendant did not have any criminal records exceeding the same criminal records and fines - Defendant did not have criminal records exceeding the same criminal records and fines; on the other hand, it is deemed that there is considerable risk that

arrow