logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.11 2014가단58098
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

As between July 29, 2014 and August 4, 2014, the Plaintiff alleged that he/she sought payment of the price since he/she supplied 32,981,547 won to the Defendant. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff supplied her meat to the Defendant solely on the basis of the statement in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of Evidence 1. There is no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff supplied her meat to the Defendant.

Rather, in full view of the aforementioned evidence and evidence Nos. 1 and 2-1 and 2, C is a joint representative director of C, and C signed in the column of the transferee of the transaction specification sheet prepared and issued by the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is recognized as having registered his/her business with the trade name “D” in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E, and did not participate in the management of D. Therefore, it is reasonable to deem that the other party who supplied the meat by the Plaintiff is C or D.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow