Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the chief director of the D Hospital located in Busan Seo-gu, is a mechanical parking lot manager established in the above hospital, and the number of cars which can be accommodated in the above parking lot is 46 large-scale mechanical parking lot.

When at least 20 mechanical parking lots are installed in the number of motor vehicles, the manager of a mechanical parking lot, etc. shall, for the safety of parking lot users, appoint a person who has received education for mechanical parking lot managers (four-hour), conducted by the Korea Transportation Safety Authority established pursuant to the Korea Transportation Safety Authority Act, as a mechanical parking lot manager.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated this and placed E ( South, 67 years old) who did not receive the education of mechanical parking lot managers conducted by the Korea Transportation Safety Authority from December 24, 2016 to March 7, 2017, as a mechanical parking lot manager.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. A person of E;

1. Domestic investigation report (e.g., the process of crackdown on the parking lot value for D hospital type);

1. The result of inquiry into the fact of the traffic administration of the Korea Transportation Safety Authority and the privately-run office (where many representatives of mechanical parking lots exist, the accused and the defense counsel are deemed to have completed the education of the manager;

I think that the act of the defendant is not a crime since the manager F completed the education.

However, in light of the reason for the revision of the Parking Lot Act, the guidance of the relevant agency, and the fact that the Defendant, who operates a mechanical parking lot, should be aware of and implement the contents of the relevant laws and regulations, this is a simple legal site where the criminal intention is not unreasonable or there is a justifiable reason for mistake of the law.

As such, the above argument cannot be seen as being rejected. Thus, the above argument is not accepted.

1. Article 29 (2) 2 of the relevant Act, Article 29 (2) 11-2 of the elective Parking Lot Act, and Article 19-20 (1) of the elective Parking Lot Act, and Article 19-20 of the elective Parking Lot Act, the choice of fines shall be