logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.15 2014가합9698
배당이의
Text

1. The Daegu District Court’s revocation of the distribution schedule prepared on December 16, 2014 with respect to the distribution procedure case of L/C at the Daegu District Court, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (i) A entered into an annual salary system with a medical corporation M (hereinafter “M”) on March 2, 2009, and worked as a manager at the pertinent medical foundation from March 2, 2009 to December 10, 2013.

Things A received the full monthly salary from M to July 2010 in accordance with the above employment contract, but after August 2010, he/she was not paid all or part of the monthly salary.

Secondly, A applied for the payment order against M in the Daegu District Court of Busan District for the payment of the above wage, etc., and received each of the following payment orders (hereinafter “each of the payment orders of this case”), and each of the above payment orders became final and conclusive as the Do of the objection period:

The wages of KRW 182,80,000 on November 16, 2012 (from August 201 to October 2012) 182,80,000 on June 29, 2013, 2013, 20,000 won (20,000,000,000; 20,000,000 on June 10, 2013, 203; 20,000 won on June 3, 2013 (20,00,000,000; 20,000,000 won on June 3, 2017, 2013; 20,748,712,380 won on August 8, 2013; 20,003; 20,000 won on June 13, 2013; and

M) On March 14, 2013, M filed an application for the suspension of compulsory execution with the Daegu High Court 2013Kaga29, the Daegu High Court 2013, 1967, based on the building name map of the building that was pronounced on March 14, 2013 (Seoul High Court 2013Gahap137), to suspend compulsory execution. On May 29, 2013, the said court decided to suspend compulsory execution until the said court 2013Na2048, subject to deposit of KRW 1 billion as security.

Shem M deposited 1 billion won as security against the deposit officer of the Daegu District Court in accordance with the purport of the above decision.

Consolidatedly, in the above appellate trial, the above appellate trial on December 2013.

arrow