The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses of the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. The sentence (six months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant led to the confession of the crime and repented his mistake.

However, the defendant not only has the record of fine, suspension of execution, and punishment several times due to violent crimes, but also has committed the crime of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, the fact that the victim did not agree with the victim, the victim wanting to be punished, and there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the scope of the recommended range of sentencing guidelines set forth in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is unfair because it is too excessive.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed by virtue of Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the burden of litigation costs arising from the trial is determined as per Disposition by applying Articles 191(1) and 190(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act as to the burden of litigation costs arising from the trial (Provided, That in the judgment of the court below, it is obvious that the judgment of the court below, which is the last column for the application of the law, was omitted by mistake “Article 186 of the Criminal Procedure Act” following the “Article 186 of the Criminal Procedure Act” in the last column for the application of the law, and thus, it is corrected to add it ex officio in accordance with Article