1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C is a person engaged in the manufacturing of vessel machinery parts in the trade name in Youngdo G of Busan, and Defendant B is a factory of the above company.

From September 4, 2006 to April 5, 2008, the Plaintiff is a person who served as the first half of the above company, and the Selection D is the Plaintiff’s wife, Selection E, and F.

B. Defendant B, around 15:00 on July 24, 2007, refused to perform the work ordered by the above Defendant at the factory within the above company, was drinking to the Plaintiff on the ground that he refused to perform the work ordered by the above Defendant, and the Plaintiff was satisfying the Plaintiff’s chest and 4th left side.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

In the physical examination conducted at the first instance court (hereinafter referred to as the "first physical examination"), the Plaintiff shall continue to be scarcity of scarcity for a period of 1 and 2 years, but the chest scarcitys may have been caused or aggravated due to the scarke, and there has been no physical disability or testamentary gift due to the accident in this case.

In the physical examination at the trial of the party (hereinafter referred to as "the second physical examination"), the plaintiff complained of the scarb and scarb, and the scarbb and scarb are considered to have been caused by the accident of this case, but the scarb and scarb of the scarb and so on, the ratio of the labor ability loss was 24% in city, and it was a temporary disability for 3 to 6 months.

【No dispute over the ground for recognition】 The evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 7-2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 12, and 4-3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 11-1 of the evidence Nos. 7-2, 3, 6, 8, 11 of the evidence Nos. 7-3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 11 of the court of first instance; the results of the physical entrustment to the Director of the International University Medical Center of Busan High Court; the results of the physical entrustment to the Director of the Busan

2. Determination on the claim for damages against the Defendants

A. The court's explanation on this part of the claim for damages is set forth in the judgment of the court of first instance.

Therefore, Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is the same as the part of the claim.