The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of three million won) by the lower court is excessively unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind, and that the defendant is not the actual operator of the defendant's faith.

However, considering the following facts: (a) the Defendant had a past conviction two times (one suspended sentence; (b) the Defendant obtained economic benefits while working as an employee from the Defendant, and the period of actual employment was considerably longer than five months (see, e.g., evidence record No. 155); (c) there is a need to eradicate the distribution order of petroleum products due to the sale of fake petroleum products; and (d) there is a growing social harm, such as confusion in the distribution order of petroleum products due to the sale of fake petroleum products; and (e) the motive, means and methods of the instant crime; and (e) circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.