logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.10.17 2018나307301
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Around December 28, 2015, Defendant B filed with an investigative agency on the following grounds: “Around October 12:13, 2015, Defendant B abused Defendant B by means of assaulting Defendant B in a way that the Plaintiff was “at the end of the day,” while the Plaintiff was in the restaurant of the Escopic Association located in Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeong-gun, the left hand hand hand of Defendant B.”

(B) The above accusation is called as “the instant complaint,” and the contents of the complaint are “the instant complaint,” b.

The public prosecutor of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office testified that the plaintiff was guilty of assault against the facts of the complaint in this case, and that the plaintiff applied for formal trial against the summary order issued by the Daegu District Court on August 17, 2016. In the above formal trial, the defendants testified that "I would like to attract the plaintiff "I would see that I would see that I would see the plaintiff's hand as "I would see that I would see the right hand hand hand hand hand on the left hand, and that I would like to attract the plaintiff's hand hand hand hand on the left hand", and the defendant C testified that "I would see the plaintiff's hand hand hand of the defendant B and see the end, I would see and see the right hand hand."

(2) On November 25, 2016, the Daegu District Court convicted the Plaintiff of a fine of KRW 300,000 on the following grounds: (a) Defendant B’s testimony is called as “the testimony of this case 1”; and (b) Defendant C’s testimony as “the testimony of this case 2”)

(Seoul District Court 2016Gohap657). (c)

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an appeal, and the said appellate court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on August 23, 2017, on the sole basis of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor on August 11, 2017, that it is difficult to view that the facts of the instant accusation were proven without any reasonable doubt, and that there is no other evidence to acknowledge it ( Daegu District Court 2016No5144). The Prosecutor appealed, but the Supreme Court appealed on November 23, 2017.

arrow