Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a KS7 car as a car.

On 15:00 on 24, 202, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, which led to the direction of transmitting the front road in the direction of the small-scale terminal.

Since the place is a place in which traffic control is performed, a person engaged in driving service shall be slowly engaged, and there was a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the collision between the victim D (the 55 years old) who was normally left pursuant to the new code in the right direction of the defendant by negligence in violation of the signal, and the victim D (the 55 years old) who was driven by the victim, who was normally left at the right direction of the defendant, to the front of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, from the injury of the victim D, such as the cutting of cage, closure, etc. of a single cage cage, other than the 1st cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cages

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statutes to a written investigation into the actual state of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of a fine for selective punishment under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act among the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Provisional Payment Order caused the instant accident because the Defendant failed to comply with the traffic laws and regulations despite the history of being punished several times due to a violation of the traffic laws on roads. The Defendant was highly likely to be subject to criticism by showing the attitude of the law in light of its attitude.

In the accident of this case, several victims are highly likely to suffer injuries and commit crimes.

However, the defendant.