1. Of the principal lawsuit of this case, the part concerning the claim for 2,571,324,849 won and damages for delay shall be dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. On November 1, 2007, the Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of building construction business, housing construction business, etc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and completed the registration of a trade name before changing the trade name on December 18, 2014. The trade name of the Plaintiff is “I Co., Ltd.” or “Plaintiff,” regardless of whether it was before or after the mutual change,” and the Defendant Co., Ltd. is an urban environment rearrangement association, the establishment of which was authorized on January 10, 2006.

B. On December 15, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union entered into a contract for construction works regarding the urban environment rearrangement project conducted between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union on the following: (a) on April 19, 201; (b) on January 24, 2013; and (c) on January 10, 2014, on three three occasions, a contract for the said construction works was entered into on December 15, 201 (hereinafter “the first contract”; (c) on April 19, 201, the first amendment contract was entered into; (d) on January 24, 201, the second amendment contract was entered into on January 24, 2013; and (e) on January 10, 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union entered into a contract for construction works regarding the urban environment rearrangement project; and (e) on the first amendment contract made on October 10, 2014; and (e) the instant contract was jointly and severally guaranteed by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

AB concluded this chapter

However, at the time of the initial contract, Defendant H was not a joint and several surety at the time of the initial contract, and the contract of this case as a joint and several surety of the Defendant Union was concluded with the Plaintiff as a joint and several surety.

1. Title of the project in this case: Urban environment rearrangement project B

4. Details of the project: Construction of new construction facilities and appurtenant construction works authorized by the competent project approving authority;

5. Business method: the construction cost that the Defendant Union pays to the Plaintiff is KRW 74.3 billion (including additional tax) on the condition that the Plaintiff completes the construction work on the land owned by the Defendant Union and the members of the Defendant Union.